This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
工作学习 / 求学深造 / 诚心请教,想读个MBA (specialized in finance),part-time, 是该去Rotman还是Schulich?请大家帮忙分析和比较一下。Thanks!
-specialday(Joyce);
2008-6-22
(#4516704@0)
-
当然是Rotman, Rotman的专长是Fiance, 加拿大第一,毫无疑问。况且现在Rotman已经是加拿大mba无争议的overall第一,strategy世界学术能力前三。
-dannyp(Danny);
2008-6-22
{76}
(#4516776@0)
-
老蛋醒醒,到时间吃药了。
-wtn(肥啫啫);
2008-6-22
(#4516785@0)
-
hahaha!
-saketini(shaken, not stirred);
2008-6-22
(#4516822@0)
-
Fiance 是什么啊,是不是fi·an·cé ,我看字典上解释是a man engaged to be married; a man to whom a woman is engaged.
-alexwei08(alexwei08);
2008-6-27
(#4525915@0)
-
I assume that you are well established. If it is the case, I doubt if there is any difference for you. If you you really want some change go for full time MBA NYC, Columbia, HBS, or Wharton. That's to say go for Wall Street.Shulick and Rodman are both nice schools. But ask yourself if they will provide you the opportunity. If not, either will just be another deco, without real value. It really depends each individual.
-harryliu(Harry);
2008-6-23
{197}
(#4517276@0)
-
非常同意wharton grads 有种让recruiter觉得在求他,rotman要是成绩上不了校长名单连一流consulting公司interview都没有。天上地下啊。如果你能去warton,千万别觉得学费贵和贪恋那点工资。
-dannyp(Danny);
2008-6-23
{168}
(#4519115@0)
-
How about INSEAD or IMD in Europe? It is one year full time program. 比加拿大的学校强,还正好有机会去欧洲转转。
-genghis(Genghis Khan);
2008-6-23
(#4519175@0)
-
don't know about IMD
-dannyp(Danny);
2008-6-23
{516}
(#4519250@0)
-
I think it depends on where to work? From the Salary point of view, top MBA in Europe is higher than top MBA in Canada. If your friend hunt his job in Canada, Rotman is better.
-legends(冰源雪豹);
2008-6-24
{254}
(#4519303@0)
-
"rotman要是成绩上不了校长名单连一流consulting公司interview都没有"
-001isbetter(不唧歪不婆妈妈的肉联);
2008-6-24
(#4519370@0)
-
exactly
-dannyp(Danny);
2008-6-24
{723}
(#4519493@0)
-
not correct, 001isbetter(不唧歪不婆妈妈的肉联) from rotman
-peteryu(最受欢迎);
2008-6-24
(#4519507@0)
-
谢谢大家的建议。目前没有去美国的打算,也不想放弃现在的工作。其实读个MBA也就是为了build up a professional (alumni) network,是不是Rotman比Schulich 更好些呢?
-specialday(Joyce);
2008-6-24
(#4520949@0)
-
Are you implying that the alumni of Rotman are better that those of Schulich?
If you got that kind of idea from someone from Schulich, it will probably the case. Otherwise, how can it be justified?There are so many factors. The best way to make a decision is probably to flip a coin.
That's not helpful, I guess.
-harryliu(Harry);
2008-6-25
{117}
(#4521650@0)
-
Flip a coin, that might be a good idea, haha (just kidding). Don’t get me wrong, that’s not what I meant and in fact that was just my question rather a comment.
-specialday(Joyce);
2008-6-25
(#4521886@0)
-
I think alumni network from both school are goodsince I faced the same question a year ago, here are some factors I considered. Hope it helps.
1) the salary after graduation
2) strength in majors. Overall, Schulich seems to have better reputation in marketing, while Rotman is in Finance and increasingly good in consulting.
3) opinions from some managers and I know. Asked their overall impression about these two schools.
the factors I didn't weight much:
1) tuition
2) ranking
3) Alumni's opinion. They all are too bias.
-dannyp(Danny);
2008-6-25
{487}
(#4522425@0)
-
Thanks much for sharing. So which MBA program/ school did you choose at the end? Also, what is the salary range for the first year graduate from both schools?
-specialday(Joyce);
2008-6-25
(#4522832@0)
-
I put the Rotman's salary range in the previous reply (the one with title 'exactly')I could only find one year salary stats for schulich, which was a few years back. The mean was around 75k and lowest is within 50k range. I verified this info with one of the spoken person from schulich in the perspective student 2007 event. The answer was interesting: he didn't believe the gap was 10k, but 6k instead. As I Schulich seems not to publish its salary stats, I assumed it didn't look pretty.
I end up choosing Rotman.
-dannyp(Danny);
2008-6-26
{435}
(#4525265@0)
-
That's interesting and good to know. Thanks again for sharing the information.
-specialday(Joyce);
2008-6-27
(#4525726@0)